太子探花

‘No serious dispute’ that Comey’s seashell post could be read as a Trump threat, prosecutors say

WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥 The Department of Justice is defending its , saying 鈥渢here is no serious dispute” that a social media post of seashells he made last year could be understood as a threat against .

Prosecutors also called into question Comey’s account that he had found the seashells in the numerical arrangement of 鈥86 47鈥 while walking on a beach in North Carolina and suggested that his May 2025 post on Instagram was an effort to generate attention for a forthcoming novel about a social media personality whose words inspire his fans to attack his foes.

late Tuesday represent the government’s most detailed explanation of its indictment and were filed in response to on grounds including that it constitutes a vindictive prosecution and that Comey’s post did not amount to a true threat. Comey’s lawyers contend that investigators in the case misled judges, submitted documents containing false statements, withheld key facts and repeatedly came up empty in their efforts to prove that Comey intended a physical threat or knew that the number 86 could suggest violence.

The entry for 鈥86鈥 from Merriam-Webster, the dictionary used by The Associated Press, says its meaning is 鈥渢o throw out,鈥 鈥渢o get rid of鈥 or 鈥渢o refuse service to.鈥 Trump, a Republican, is the 47th president.

The Justice Department maintains that the post constituted a real threat

Federal prosecutors maintain that the photo of the seashells, which Comey said he found on the beach, constituted a threat against Trump. Comey deleted the post shortly after he put it up, saying he did not know that anyone interpreted the numbers as a call to violence. His lawyers have said that the slogan has long meant to 鈥済et rid of鈥 or 鈥渆ject鈥 and has been featured on thousands of items sold online and regularly displayed at protests.

But the department sought in its filings to place the post against the backdrop of against Trump in the months before and after Comey’s post. Prosecutors say that two minutes before the post was made, Comey’s wife texted him a screenshot of a definition of 鈥86鈥 that said “to get rid of or refuse service.鈥

“There is no serious dispute that an objective viewer of Comey鈥檚 post could read it to mean 鈥楰ill President Trump,鈥欌 prosecutors wrote.

The photo was posted days before Comey was set to release a novel he wrote titled 鈥淔DR Drive,鈥 in which a prosecutor pursues a far-right social media personality who has called out his adversaries by name and inspired violence against them by his fans, the department said.

After the Instagram post provoked an outcry, according to the government’s filings, Comey’s publishing agent observed in a text message to him that he had 鈥済one viral.鈥 Comey responded that that was 鈥渘ot my intention, but I鈥檒l be OK if it sells books.鈥 The agent replied, 鈥滿usic to an agent’s ears.”

Prosecutors also asserted there was 鈥渞eason to doubt鈥 Comey鈥檚 account of having come upon the seashells while on a walk, saying they were located 4 miles (6 kilometers) 鈥渄own from the beach from beachfront property where Comey was staying, in an area separated from the ocean by a sand dune.鈥 They said there was “no evidence that anyone else arranged, photographed, or even saw the shells.鈥

Comey has called the case vindictive, but prosecutors deny that

Comey’s lawyers have called the indictment, , part of a Trump retribution campaign . Trump in 2017 as Comey was overseeing an investigation into potential ties between Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and Russia. Trump since then has called for him and other perceived adversaries to be jailed.

But the Justice Department denied allegations of vindictiveness, saying the decision to indict Comey was made by the U.S. attorney in the area and did not stem from a directive from the president or the attorney general.

To bolster their claims that Comey was unjustly targeted, defense team argued that investigators struggled to develop compelling evidence from witnesses that Comey had intended the post as a threat, but they concealed that from federal magistrates as they applied for warrants to search digital accounts associated with Comey and his wife

For instance, defense lawyers have said, the FBI searched an internal database of information about open and closed investigations for any indication of an association between Comey and the term 鈥86鈥 but found inconclusive results. An FBI agent also requested a review of the FBI file for the case against reputed mobster John Gambino, which Comey worked on as a young prosecutor, but found no references to the term 鈥86.鈥

Investigators also interviewed a key government cooperator in the case, Salvatore 鈥淪ammy the Bull鈥 Gravano, who said he did not recall ever discussing the term 鈥86鈥 with Comey or hearing it in connection with the trial.

The latest filings made clear that the administration was standing behind the premise of the case.

鈥淣o Government theory was disproved at that time, or now. No intentionally false omission exists, much less one made with reckless disregard for the truth,鈥 prosecutors wrote. “The evidence still supports that Defendant acted at least recklessly by consciously disregarding a substantial risk that his coded message of 鈥8647鈥 that he sent to his 200,000 or so Instagram followers, and the millions of secondary social media users who would view this as threatening violence against the President of the United States.

Copyright © 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.

Federal 太子探花 Network Logo
Log in to your WTOP account for notifications and alerts customized for you.